< Zurück   INHALT   Weiter >


Abbott, J. 2011. Cacophony or Empowerment? Analysing the Impact of New Information Communication Technologies and New Social Media in Southeast Asia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 30 (4): 3–31.

Alemann, U., und R. Heinze. 1981. Kooperativer Staat und Korporatismus: Dimensionen der Neokorporatismusdiskussion. In Neokorporatismus, hrsg. U. Alemann, 43–61. Campus. Frankfurt. Asian Barometer. 2014. East Asia Barometer Online Data Analysis. jdsurvey.net/eab/

Analize.jsp. Zugegriffen: 22. Januar 2015.

Atkins, W. 2002. The Politics of Southeast Asia's New Media. London: Curzon.

Barr, M. 2014. The Ruling Elite of Singapore. Networks of Power and Influence. London: I.B. Tauris.

Bellow, T. 2009. Meritocracy and the Singapore Political System. Asian Journal of Political Science 17 (1): 24–44.

Bertelsmann Stiftung. 2014. Bertelsmann Transformation Index 2014. bti-project.de/ bti-home/. Zugegriffen: 16. Januar 2015.

BICC (Bonn Center for International Conversion). 2013: Global Militarization Index 2012. gmi.bicc.de/. Zugegriffen: 15. Januar 2015.

Blondel, J. 2006. The national executives in East and Southeast Asia. In Democratisation, governance and regionalism in East and Southeast Asia: a comparative study, hrsg. I. Marsh, 89–123. London/New York: Routledge.

Carlson, M., und M. Turner. 2008. Public Support for Democratic Governance in Southeast Asia.

Asian Journal of Political Science 16 (3): 219–239.

Carnell, F. 1955. Political Ferment in Singapore. Far Eastern Survey 24 (7): 97–102. Case, W. 2002. Politics in Southeast Asia. Democracy or Less. Richmond: Curzon Press.

Case, W. 2011. Executive Accountability in Southeast Asia: The Role of Legislatures in New Democracies and Under Electoral Authoritarianism. East West Center Policy Studies 57. Honolulu: East West Center.

Chang, A., Chu, Y.-h., und B. Welsh. 2013. Southeast Asia: Sources of Regime Support. Journal of Democracy 24 (2): 150–164.

Chee, H. 1976. The Role of Parliamentary Politicians in Singapore. Legislative Studies Quarterly

1 (4): 423–441.

Cheong, Y. 1999. The Political Structures of the Independent States. In The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia. Vol. 2, hrsg. Nicholas Tarling, 59–137. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cheung, A. 2008. The story of two administrative states: state capacity in Hong Kong and Singapore. Pacific Review 21 (2): 121–145.

Chong, T. 2012. A Return to Normal Politics. Singapore General Elections 2011. In Southeast Asian Affairs 2001, hrsg. D. Singh, 283–298. Singapore: ISEAS.

Chua, B. 2008. Singapore in 2007: High Wage Ministers and the Management of Gays and Elderly.

Asian Survey 48 (1): 55–61.

CIA (Central Intelligence Agency). 2014. CIA World Factbook. https://cia.gov/library/ publications/the-world-factbook/. Zugegriffen: 15. Januar 2015.

Croissant, A., Kuehn, D., Lorenz, P., und P. Chambers. 2013. Democratization and civilian control in Asia. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Czada, R. 2004. Konjunkturen des Korporatismus: Zur Geschichte eines Paradigmenwechsels in der Verbändeforschung. In Politische Vierteljahresschrift Sonderheft 25, hrsg. W. Streeck, 37–

63. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

Da Cunha, D. 1999. Sociological Aspects of the Singaporean Armed Forces. Armed Forces & Society 25 (1): 459–475.

Department of Statistics Singapore. 2007. Key Household Economic Trends 2006, February 2007.

Singapore: DSS.

Department of Statistics Singapore. 2013a. Key Household Economic Trends 2013. Singapore: DSS.

Department of Statistics Singapore. 2013b. Yearbook of Statistics 2013. Singapore: DSS. Duverger, M. 1959. Die politischen Parteien. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.

Election Department Singapore. 2014. Election Results. eld.gov.sg/homepage.html.

Zugegriffen: 25. Januar 2014.

Elgie, R. 2013. The semi-presidential one. semipresidentialism.com/. Zugegriffen: 24.

Januar 2015.

Evans, P. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Fetzer, J. 2008. Election Strategy and Ethnic Politics in Singapore. Taiwan Journal of Democracy

4(1): 135–153.

Freedom House. 2014. Freedom of the Press 2014. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedompress/freedom-press-2014#.VL07j6yGeZQ. Zugegriffen: 19. Januar 2015.

Gallagher, M. 1991. Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems. Electoral Studies

10 (1): 33–51.

Geddes, B., Wright, J., und E. Frantz. 2014. Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set. Perspectives on Politics 12 (2): 313–331.

George, C. 2002. Contentious Journalism and the Internet: Towards Democratic Discourse in Malaysia and Singapore. Singapore: Singapore University Press.

George, C. 2007. Consolidating authoritarian rule: calibrated coercion in Singapore. Pacific Review

20 (2): 127–145.

Hadenius, A., und J. Teorell. 2006. Authoritarian Regimes: Stability, Change, and Pathways to Democracy, 1979–2003. Kellog Institute Working Paper Nr. 331. https://kellogg.nd.edu/ publications/workingpapers/WPS/331.pdf. Zugegriffen 30. Januar 2015.

Hamilton-Hart, N. 2000. The Singapore State Revisited. Pacific Review 13 (2): 195–216.

Haque, S. 2004. Governance and Bureaucracy in Singapore: Contemporary Reforms and Implications. International Political Science Review 25 (2): 227–240.

Hefner, R. 2001. The Politics of Multiculturalism: Pluralism and Citizenship in Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Heritage Foundation. 2014. 2014 Index of Economic Freedom. heritage.org/index/.

Zugegriffen: 22. Januar 2015.

Huxley, T. 2000. Defending the Lion City. The Armed Forces of Singapore. St. Leonard's: Allen und Unwin

Hwee, Y. 2002. Electoral Politics in Singapore. In Electoral Politics in Southeast & East Asia, hrsg. A. Croissant, G. Bruns und M. John, 203–233. Singapore: FES.

IISS (International Institute for Strategic Studies). 2014. The Military Balance 2014. London: IISS. Inglehart, R., und C. Welzel. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Internet World Statistics. 2013. Usage and Population Statistics 2013. internetworldstats.com/stats3.htm. Zugegriffen: 15. Januar 2015.

IUP (International Parliamentary Union). 2014. Cambodia. ipu.org/parline-e/reports/ 2051_arc.htm. Zugegriffen: 17. Januar 2015.

Jones, D. 2002. Recent Reforms in Singapore's Administrative Elite: Responding to the Challenge of a Rapidly Changing Economy and Society. Asian Journal of Political Science 10 (2): 70–93.

Kelsen, H. 1925. Allgemeine Staatslehre. Berlin: Julius Springer.

Laakso, M., und R. Taagepera. 1979. „Effective“ Number of Parties: A measure with application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12 (1). 3–27.

Lee, T. 2005. Gestural politics: Civil society in “new” Singapore. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 20 (2): 132–154.

Lee, T. 2010. The Media, Cultural Control and Government in Singapore. London: Routledge. Leifer, M. 1966. Communal Violence in Singapore. Asian Survey 4 (10): 1115–1121.

Leong, H. 2000. Prime Ministerial Leadership and Policy-Making Style in Singapore: Lee Kuan Yew and Goh Chok Tong compared. Asian Journal of Political Science 8 (1): 91–122.

Levitsky, S., und L. Way. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism. Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lijphart, A. 2012. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, 2. Aufl. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

Linz, J. 1975. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. In Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 3: Macropolitical Theory, hrsg. F. Greenstein, und N. Polsby, 175–412. Reading: Addison-Wesley. Luhmann, N. 1994. Politische Planung. Aufsätze zur Soziologie von Politik und Verwaltung. 4.

Aufl. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

Mauzy, D., und R. Milne. 2002. Singapore Politics Under the People's Action Party. London: Routledge.

Means, G. 1996. Soft Authoritarianism in Malaysia and Singapore. Journal of Democracy 7 (4): 103–117.

Milne, R. 1966. Singapore's Exit from Malaysia: the Consequences of Ambiguity. Asian Survey

6 (3): 175–184.

Ministry of Manpower. 2013. Singapore Yearbook of Manpower Statistics, 2012. Singapore: Ministry of Manpower.

Moustafa, T., und T. Ginsburg. 2008. Introduction. The Function of Courts in Authoritarian Politics. In Rule by Law. The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, hrsg. T. Ginsburg, und

T. Moustafa, 1–23. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mutalib, H. 2002. Constitutional-Electoral Reforms and Politics in Singapore. Legislative Studies Quarterly 27 (4): 659–672.

Mutalib, H. 2011. The Singapore Minority Dilemma. Asian Survey 51 (6): 1156–1171.

Neureiter, M. 2013. Organized Labor and Democratization in Southeast Asia. Asian Survey 53 (6): 1063–1086.

Obinger, Herbert. 2004. Politik und Wirtschaftswachstum. Ein internationaler Vergleich. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

OECD. 2014. Stat. Extracts. Income Distribution and Poverty. stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?

DataSetCode=IDD. Zugegriffen: 22. Januar 2015.

Ooi, C. 1998. Singapore. In Political Party Systems and Democratic Development in East and Southeast Asia, Vol.1, hrsg. W. Sachsenroder, U. Frings, 343–402. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Ortmann, S. 2010a. Opposition and Regime Legitimacy: A Comparative Study of Singapore and Hong Kong. Journal of Asian and African Studies 45 (1): 67–86.

Ortmann, S. 2010b. Politics and Change in Singapore and Hong Kong: Containing Contention.

London and New York: Routledge.

Ortmann, S. 2011. Singapore. Authoritarianism but newly competitive. Journal of Democracy 22 (4): 153–164.

Ortmann, S. 2012. Policy Advocacy in a Competitive Authoritarian Regime: The Growth of Civil Society and Agenda Setting in Singapore. Administration and Society 44 (6): 13–25.

Park, C., und Y.-t. Chang. 2014. Regime Performance and Democratic Legitimacy. In Democracy in East Asia, hrsg. L. Diamond, Plattner, M., und Y.-h. Chu, 48–75. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Piper, N. 2006. Migrant Worker Activism in Singapore and Malaysia: Freedom of Association and the Role of the State. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 15 (3): 359–380.

Public Service Division. 2013. Overview of Public Service. psd.gov.sg/singaporepublic-service/overview-of-public-service. Zugegriffen: 23. Januar 2014.

Quah, J. 2010. Public Administration Singapore-Style. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. Rajah, J. 2012. Authoritarian Rule of Law. Legislation, Discourse and Legitimacy in Singapore.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rieger, C. 2001. Singapore. In Elections in Asia and the Pacific, Vol. II, hrsg. D. Nohlen, Grotz, F., und C. Hartmann, 239–261. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rodan, G. 2003. Embracing electronic media but suppressing civil society: authoritarian consolidation in Singapore. Pacific Review 16 (4): 503–524.

Rodan, G. 2008. Singapore „Exceptionalism“? Authoritarian Rule and State Transformation. In Political Transitions in Dominant Party Systems: Learning to Lose, hrsg. J. Wong, und E. Friedman, 231–251. New York: Routledge. 2008.

Sajó, A. 1999. Limiting Government. An Introduction to Constitutionalism. Budapest/London: CEU Press.

Saw, S.-H. 2012. The Population of Singapore. Singapore: ISEAS.

Schedler, A. 2013. The Politics of Uncertainty. Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schmidt, M. 2014. Legitimation durch Performanz. Zur Output-Legitimität in Autokratien. In Ideokratien im Vergleich. Legitimation – Kooptation – Repression, hrsg. U. Backes, und S. Kailitz, 297–315. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Schmitter, P. 1974. Still the Century of Corporatism? Review of Politics 36: 85–131.

Schmitter, P., und G. Lehmbruch. Hrsg. 1982: Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills: University of California Press.

Shin, D. 2012. Is Democracy Emerging as a Universal Value? A Contrarian Perspective. Asia Barometer Survey Working Paper No. 68. asianbarometer.org/newenglish/publications/ workingpapers/no.68.pdf. Zugegriffen: 15. Januar 2015.

Silverstein, G. 2008. Singapore: the exception that proves rules matter. In Rule By Law. The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, hrsg. T. Moutafa, und T. Ginsburg, 73–101. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Slater, D. 2010. Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Steffani, W. 1979. Parlamentarische und präsidentielle Demokratie. Strukturelle Aspekte westlicher Demokratie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

Taagepera, R. 1998. Effective magnitude and effective threshold. Electoral Studies 17 (4): 393–


Tan, A. 2006. Singapore's Approach to Homeland Security. In Southeast Asian Affairs 2005, hrsg.

D. Singh, 349–362. Singapore: ISEAS.

Tan, K. 1997. The Presidency in Singapore. In Managing Political Change in Singapore: The Elected Presidency, hrsg. K. Tan, und P. Lam, 9–51. London/New York: Routledge.

Tan, K. 2002. The Making and Remaking of Constitutions in Southeast Asia: An Overview.

Singapore Journal of International & Comparative Law 6 (2002): 1–41.

Tan, K. 2012. Singapore in 2011: A „New Normal“ in Politics? Asian Survey 52 (1): 220–226. Tan, T. 2001. Singapore: Civil Military Fusion. In Coercion and Governance: The Declining Po-

litical Role of the Military in Asia, hrsg. M. Alagappa, 276–293. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Tan, T. 2012. The Armed Forces and Politics in Singapore. In The Political Resurgence of the Military in Southeast Asia. Conflict and Leadership, hrsg. M. Mietzner, 148–166. London: Routledge.

Tan, S., und A. Chew. 2008. Governing Singapore's Security Sector: Problems, Prospects, and Paradox. Contemporary Southeast Asia 30 (2): 241–263.

Temasek. 2011. Statement of Clarification – Temasek's share of Singapore economy possibly around 10 %. temasek.com.sg/mediacentre/medialetters?detailid=8258. Zugegriffen: 25. Januar 2015.

Tey, T. 2008. Confining the Freedom of the Press in Singapore: A „Pragmatic“ Press for „NationBuilding“? Human Rights Quarterly 30 (4): 876–905.

The Wall Street Journal. 2013. Rare Riot Hits Singapore. Fatal Road Accident Angers Foreign Workers. wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303330204579246540635617948. Zugegriffen: 23. Januar 2014.

Thiery, P., Sehring, J., und W. Muno. 2009. Die Messung von Rechtsstaatlichkeit. In Interdisziplinäre Rechtsforschung zwischen Rechtswirklichkeit, Rechtsanalyse und Rechtsgestaltung, hrsg.

J. Estermann, 211–230. Bern: Stämpfli.

Thio, L. 2008. Singapore – The Indigenisation of a Westminster Import. In Constitutionalism in Southeast Asia, hrsg. C. Hill, und J. Menzel, 249–299. Singapore: KAS.

Thio, L., und K. Tan. 2009. Evolution of a Revolution: 40 Years of the Singapore Constitution.

London: Routledge-Curzon.

Thompson, M. 2001. Whatever Happened to „Asian Values“? Journal of Democracy 12 (4): 154– 165.

Transparency International. 2014. Corruption Perception Index. transparency.org. Zugegriffen: 17. Januar 2015.

UNDP. 2014. Human Development Index. hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-developmentindex-hdi. Zugegriffen: 23. Januar 2015.

Vasu, N. 2012. Governance through Difference in Singapore. Corporatism's Composition, Characteristics, and Complications. Asian Survey 52 (4): 734–753.

Velayutham, S. 2007. Responding to Globalization: Nation, Culture and Identity in Singapore.

Singapore: ISEAS.

Vennewald, W. 1994. Singapur: Herrschaft der Professionals und Technokraten – Ohnmacht der Demokratie? Grenzen und Möglichkeiten der Demokratisierung in einem südostasiatischen Schwellenland. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

Verweij, M., und R. Pelizzo. 2009. Singapore: Does Authoritarianism Pay? Journal of Democracy

20 (2): 18–32.

Wah, K. 1973. Political Development in Singapore, 1945–55. Singapore: Singapore University Press.

Walsh, S. 2007. The Roar of the Lion City: Ethnicity, Gender, and Culture in the Singapore Armed Forces. Armed Forces & Society 33 (2): 265–285.

Weber, M. 1972. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie. Studienausg., 5., rev. Aufl. Tübingen: Mohr.

Weiss, M. 2014. Of inequality and inrritation: new agendas and activism in Malaysia and Singapore. Democratization 21 (5): 867–887.

Weltbank. 2014a. World Development Indicators. data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/worlddevelopment-indicators. Zugegriffen: 15. Januar 2015.

Weltbank. 2014b. Worldwide Governance Indicators. info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/ sc_chart.asp. Zugegriffen: 20. Januar 2015.

White Paper. 1991. White Paper on Shared Values. https://academia.edu/1740666/White_ paper_on_shared_values_1991_. Zugegriffen: 13. Januar 2015.

Wong, T., Wahn, P.-s., und H.-H. Hsiao. 2011. The bases of political trust in six Asian societies: Institutional and cultural explanations compared. International Political Science Review 32(3): 263–281.

Worthington, R. 2001. Between Hermes and Themis: An Empirical Study of the Contemporary Judiciary in Singapore. Journal of Law and Society 28 (4): 490–519.

Wu, Y. 2012. Management of Incongruence in Semi-Presidentialism: Taiwan and Beyond. Paper presented at the 22nd World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Madrid, July 8–12, 2012. paperroom.ipsa.org/papers/paper_9842.pdf. Zugegriffen: 23.

Januar 2015.

Zakaria, F. 2003. The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad. New York:

W. W. Norton & Company.

< Zurück   INHALT   Weiter >